<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Journal of the Civil War Era</title>
	<atom:link href="http://journalofthecivilwarera.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://journalofthecivilwarera.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 14:49:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forum: The Future of Civil War Era Studies by Journal of the Civil War Era in Top 10 &#124; UNC Press Civil War 150</title>
		<link>http://journalofthecivilwarera.com/forum-the-future-of-civil-war-era-studies/#comment-13192</link>
		<dc:creator>Journal of the Civil War Era in Top 10 &#124; UNC Press Civil War 150</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 14:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalofthecivilwarera.com/?page_id=194#comment-13192</guid>
		<description>[...] for the current issue at the journal website. The current issue includes a special online-only forum on the Future of Civil War Era Studies.   May 16th, 2012 &#124; Tags: journal of the civil war era &#124; Category: Journal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the current issue at the journal website. The current issue includes a special online-only forum on the Future of Civil War Era Studies.   May 16th, 2012 | Tags: journal of the civil war era | Category: Journal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forum: The Future of Civil War Era Studies by Wyatt Evans</title>
		<link>http://journalofthecivilwarera.com/forum-the-future-of-civil-war-era-studies/#comment-1171</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyatt Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalofthecivilwarera.com/?page_id=194#comment-1171</guid>
		<description>This topic will be taken up in earnest at Drew University&#039;s &quot;The Future of Civil War History&quot; conference next week: http://depts.drew.edu/grad/cwconf/Welcome.html. Daniel Sutherland will be giving the keynote, and we will conclude on Saturday with a luncheon and a roundtable discussion on where Civil War era studies are headed in the 21st century. The event kicks off at 5:00 pm on Friday with a reception.  It is not too late to register.  Students, colleagues, and members of the public are most welcome. Best Regards, Wyatt Evans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This topic will be taken up in earnest at Drew University&#8217;s &#8220;The Future of Civil War History&#8221; conference next week: <a href="http://depts.drew.edu/grad/cwconf/Welcome.html" rel="nofollow">http://depts.drew.edu/grad/cwconf/Welcome.html</a>. Daniel Sutherland will be giving the keynote, and we will conclude on Saturday with a luncheon and a roundtable discussion on where Civil War era studies are headed in the 21st century. The event kicks off at 5:00 pm on Friday with a reception.  It is not too late to register.  Students, colleagues, and members of the public are most welcome. Best Regards, Wyatt Evans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forum: The Future of Civil War Era Studies by The Future of Civil War Era Studies &#8211; A Response to Stephen Berry&#8217;s Top Ten List &#124; Cosmic America</title>
		<link>http://journalofthecivilwarera.com/forum-the-future-of-civil-war-era-studies/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future of Civil War Era Studies &#8211; A Response to Stephen Berry&#8217;s Top Ten List &#124; Cosmic America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalofthecivilwarera.com/?page_id=194#comment-127</guid>
		<description>[...] recently read an intriguing article in the Journal of the Civil War Era by historian Stephen Berry of the University of Georgia. Berry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently read an intriguing article in the Journal of the Civil War Era by historian Stephen Berry of the University of Georgia. Berry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of Civil War Era Studies: Slavery and Capitalism by Marc Egnal</title>
		<link>http://journalofthecivilwarera.com/forum-the-future-of-civil-war-era-studies/the-future-of-civil-war-era-studies-slavery-and-capitalism/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Egnal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 17:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalofthecivilwarera.com/?page_id=310#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Seth Rockman has provided a valuable, engaging essay on slavery and capitalism. However, I must dissent from his point of view which highlights works emphasizing the “economic modernity” of the South, and which contends that “if capitalism means the application of commodified labor for producing exports to distant markets in exchanges undergirded by sanctified property, sophisticated credit instruments, and profit-seeking, then the plantation South was capitalist.”

Not all recent works point in the direction of such modernity (for example, see the dissent within _The Old South’s Modern Worlds_, a collection Rockman cites). But more significantly, leading Southerners would not have recognized the society Rockman described. Prominent leaders in the deep South, like John C. Calhoun and William Lowndes Yancey were proud their society was less focused on money-making than the North.

And outspoken reformers like Thomas Dew, James DeBow, and Edmund Ruffin, who were also Southern nationalists, accepted that the South had to defend its labor system despite all its inefficiencies. Noted Ruffin: “I would not hesitate a moment to prefer the entire existing social, domestic and industrial conditions of these slaveholding states, with all the now existing evils of indolence and waste, and generally exhausting tillage and declining fertility, to the entire conditions of any other country on the face of the globe.”

Books like _A Deplorable Scarcity_ by Fred Bateman and Thomas Weiss make clear that planters shunned profitable investments because the prestige that came from holding numerous slaves was more important than profit maximization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth Rockman has provided a valuable, engaging essay on slavery and capitalism. However, I must dissent from his point of view which highlights works emphasizing the “economic modernity” of the South, and which contends that “if capitalism means the application of commodified labor for producing exports to distant markets in exchanges undergirded by sanctified property, sophisticated credit instruments, and profit-seeking, then the plantation South was capitalist.”</p>
<p>Not all recent works point in the direction of such modernity (for example, see the dissent within _The Old South’s Modern Worlds_, a collection Rockman cites). But more significantly, leading Southerners would not have recognized the society Rockman described. Prominent leaders in the deep South, like John C. Calhoun and William Lowndes Yancey were proud their society was less focused on money-making than the North.</p>
<p>And outspoken reformers like Thomas Dew, James DeBow, and Edmund Ruffin, who were also Southern nationalists, accepted that the South had to defend its labor system despite all its inefficiencies. Noted Ruffin: “I would not hesitate a moment to prefer the entire existing social, domestic and industrial conditions of these slaveholding states, with all the now existing evils of indolence and waste, and generally exhausting tillage and declining fertility, to the entire conditions of any other country on the face of the globe.”</p>
<p>Books like _A Deplorable Scarcity_ by Fred Bateman and Thomas Weiss make clear that planters shunned profitable investments because the prestige that came from holding numerous slaves was more important than profit maximization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of Civil War Era Studies: Military History by The Future of Civil War Military History? &#171; Crossroads</title>
		<link>http://journalofthecivilwarera.com/forum-the-future-of-civil-war-era-studies/the-future-of-civil-war-era-studies-military-history/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future of Civil War Military History? &#171; Crossroads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalofthecivilwarera.com/?page_id=315#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] Era recently published a roundtable of views looking toward the future of Civil War scholarship.  Here&#8217;s what Marton A. Myers had to say about Civil War military history.  What do you think?  What does [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Era recently published a roundtable of views looking toward the future of Civil War scholarship.  Here&#8217;s what Marton A. Myers had to say about Civil War military history.  What do you think?  What does [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

